Our
Methodology.

The Cunt Score is a composite editorial rating from 1 to 100, reflecting the severity and breadth of documented awful behaviour. It is not a legal verdict, a moral judgment, or a statement of criminal guilt. It is editorial commentary based on public record.

Scores are calculated across five weighted criteria: documented evidence (30%), pattern of behaviour (25%), scale of impact (20%), hypocrisy index (15%), and moderated community voting (10%).

A score of 1–30 indicates mildly irritating behaviour — the kind most of us encounter on a Tuesday. Scores of 31–60 represent genuinely awful conduct with documented impact. Scores of 61–80 reflect spectacularly bad behaviour with systemic elements. Scores of 81–100 are reserved for Hall of Shame tier subjects whose conduct is both extensive and well-documented.

Every claim on this platform must be supported by at least one credible source. We define credible as: established news organisations, official public records (court filings, regulatory decisions, Hansard, SEC filings), verified public statements from the subject, or corroborated witness accounts published by credible outlets.

We do not accept anonymous tips as evidence. We do not publish unsupported allegations. We do not make criminal accusations without official public records confirming same.

All sources are linked. All links are checked at time of publication. We cannot guarantee third-party content remains available.

We use four labels to distinguish the nature of content on each profile:

VERIFIED FACT — Supported by official public records, court documents, or reporting from two or more independent credible news outlets.

EDITORIAL OPINION — Our assessment or commentary based on documented facts. Clearly distinguished from factual reporting.

SATIRE — Exaggeration, parody, or satirical commentary. Clearly marked as such. Not intended to be taken as literal fact.

DISPUTED — Claims that are contested by the subject, their representatives, or credible counter-evidence. Published with full context.

All nominations are reviewed by our editorial team before publication. We do not auto-publish. We do not publish nominations that contain private personal information, threats, or unsupported criminal allegations.

Profiles are reviewed quarterly. Scores may change as new evidence emerges, corrections are accepted, or context changes. Every score update is logged in the profile audit trail.

Subjects may submit corrections or a right of reply at any time via our corrections page. Responses are published in full, unedited, alongside the original profile.

We take factual accuracy seriously. If you believe a profile contains an error of fact, you may submit a correction request via our contact page. We will review within 10 business days.

If a correction is accepted, we will update the profile, note the correction prominently, and log it in the audit trail. We will not silently delete content.

If you are the subject of a profile, you have the right to submit a formal response of up to 800 words. This will be published in full, unedited, on your profile page. We do not remove profiles on the basis of discomfort alone.

cunt.pro operates as a satirical commentary and opinion platform. Content is published under applicable defamation law protections for opinion, commentary, and satire. We do not claim that inclusion in this directory is evidence of criminal conduct unless supported by official public records.

We comply with applicable data protection law. We respond to valid legal requests. We maintain records of all editorial decisions.

If you have a legal concern, please contact us through our legal enquiries channel. We will respond within 5 business days.